This week we practice with abstraction. Chapter 2 in Sethuraman is our starting point and model.
34x + 21y = 1(I chose two adjacent Fibonacci numbers for this example - large enough so that you can see what's happening, small enough so that it shouldn't take you too long.)
One way to do that is to show that after two steps the smaller number (the second remainder) is at most m/2. Here's a hint. If the first remainder is already < m/2 then there's nothing more to prove because the second remainder will be even smaller. If the first remainder is > m/2 you should be able to see directly what the quotient and remainder are the next time. (If you can't see it right away algebraically, try a few numerical examples.)
6 hour clock:
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 * 0 1 2 3 4 5
----------- -----------
0 |0 1 2 3 4 5 0 |0 0 0 0 0 0
1 |1 2 3 4 5 0 1 |0 1 2 3 4 5
2 |2 3 4 5 0 1 2 |0 2 4 0 2 4
3 |
Then spend some time commenting on what seems interesting to
you. Speculate about what you would expect to find if you went to the
trouble of working out the full tables for 12 and 13 hour clocks.
Note: these observations are the most important part of the problem. I assume you can do all the arithmetic and get the answers right, so I won't even spend time checking it. What I want to see you do is think about what you can learn from all that arithmetic.
Try to state your observations as formal conjectures, like "If (n has some property) then for the n hour clock the + (or *) table will (have some particular property)"
(Some of your conjectures might be for every n, some for only particular kinds of integers n.)
If you get really ambitious you can try to prove that some of your conjectures are theorems.
Note: Sethuraman discusses the 2-, 3- and n-hour clocks (without calling them that, and with a particularly clumsy notation) in examples 8 and 9 on pages 38-40. You're free to read that (of course) but I don't recommend it.
a + b sqrt(-5)for integers
a and b . That way you won't
need to look back at Exercise 5.