For more information, follow the term paper link on the course home page.
Your letter should be polite, respectful, convincing, not too long and perhaps a little bit humorous (but not sarcastic). Type it and address and date it as a letter to be sent by snail mail.
We will send the best letter or letters to the author, in hopes that he will respond.
Last year the Massachusetts State Lottery distributed over $761 million in Direct Local Aid to the Cities and Towns of the Commonwealth.
What happens to the revenue which the Lottery generates from sales?Revenue generated from Lottery sales is used for three purposes.
1. A minimum of 45% of revenues stays in the State Lottery Fund to be paid out in prizes. Currently, the Lottery's prize percentage is over 69%.
2. A portion of revenues is transferred to the Commonwealth's General Fund for the expenses incurred in administering and operating the Lottery. The administrative and operating expenses of the Lottery are appropriated by the legislature as part of the annual state budget. Operating expenses cannot exceed 15%. Currently, operating expenses are under 8%. These operating expenses include 5.8% in commissions and bonuses paid to the sales agents who sell the tickets and under 2% in administrative expenses due to Lottery operation.
3. After prizes and expenses, the remaining Lottery revenues (approximately 23%) is transferred to the Local Aid Fund and returned to the cities and towns of the Commonwealth in the form of local aid.
We will learn how to do this with the Excel spreadsheet soon. If you already know how, you may do it that way now. If you don't, draw your pie chart neatly by hand.
Last year UMass Boston experimented with the plagiarism detection software described at www.turnitin.com/static/plagiarism.html that claims it can identify plagiarism in essays students write. If you were a student last year the software might have looked at the papers you write for some course. We don't know whether UMass Boston bought a license to use this software - we think not, since we haven't heard anything about it.
Suppose that the software can actually detect every cheater and that it's 99% accurate in declaring honest students honest. (We made up these numbers since the company does not advertise them.) Sounds like a pretty good test.