[MassHistPres] Possible developer threat to LHDs

[Jessica Rudden-Dube]

Hi All,

We are aware of the legislation and have been in touch with Senator
Comerford’s and Rep. Sangiolo’s offices over the last month, and are
submitting written testimony which we will share very soon.


*Jessica Rudden-Dube*
Executive Director
Preservation Massachusetts
(617)723-3383 x103
jruddendube at preservationmass.org
www.preservationmass.org
Post Office Square
6 Main Street Extension, Suite 613
Plymouth, MA 02360





On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 7:45 PM anneforbes--- via MassHistPres <
masshistpres at cs.umb.edu> wrote:

> Has PreservationMass sent in comments or taken a position on this bill?
>
> And why would MHC not have been consulted?
>
> Anne Forbes
> Acton
>
> On Thursday, June 12, 2025 at 07:14:25 PM EDT, Eric Dray via MassHistPres <
> masshistpres at cs.umb.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Frank and Sarah. This bill is really bad, and kind of odd.
> On the one hand, it would extend demo delay to every town or city with an
> historical commission, which is essentially every town and city (hard to
> imagine the builder class would want that)
> But then, it also extends the demo delay policy into the chapter 40C
> process. This would mean that the ability for 40C districts to prevent
> demolition outright would be substituted with demo delay. That would be a
> terrible, frankly unthinkable, consequence for 40C districts.
> Sarah, if I’m reading this wrong, let me know. And if I’m not, we need to
> sound the alarm.
> Eric
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 12, 2025, at 4:24 PM, Dennis De Witt via MassHistPres <
> masshistpres at cs.umb.edu> wrote:
>
> 
>
> It was introduced in the house by Rep Amy Mah Sangiolo (D) of Newton.
>
> On Jun 12, 2025, at 10:51 AM, Sullivan, Charles M. <
> csullivan at cambridgema.gov> wrote:
>
> The House designation for this bill is HD 4331.
>
> ___________________________
> Charles Sullivan, Executive Director
> Cambridge Historical Commission
> 831 Massachusetts Avenue
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/831+Massachusetts+Avenue+Cambridge,+Mass.+02139?entry=gmail&source=g>
> Cambridge, Mass.
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/831+Massachusetts+Avenue+Cambridge,+Mass.+02139?entry=gmail&source=g>
> 02139
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/831+Massachusetts+Avenue+Cambridge,+Mass.+02139?entry=gmail&source=g>
> 617 349-4684
>
>
> *From:* MassHistPres <masshistpres-bounces at cs.umb.edu> *On Behalf Of *Dennis
> De Witt via MassHistPres
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 11, 2025 10:39 PM
> *To:* MHC MHC listserve <masshistpres at cs.umb.edu>
> *Subject:* [MassHistPres] Possible developer threat to LHDs
>
> You should urgently be aware of S1428 a Senate bill that has been
> introduced in the Legislature, with an identical House counterpart (I don’t
> have its number).  See https://malegislature.gov/Bills/194/S1428
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/malegislature.gov/Bills/194/S1428__;!!GolgDdAAPFHvrrz0!dX4iYk9y0jhxEVc5Nb2Bid6DSlM_3a-nK8fp5kNAadkVRp3Fw2UnyN5BQTFC2JML_Nv3gqAgUdwetknPaEDDKEw0nOKW4zdk$>
>
> I have just quickly scanned it, but it seems to have at least two
> purposes:
>
> 1) Create a standard MGL format for Demolition Delay bylaws that would
> have to be adopted under MGL40 Section 8D (Historical Commissions), rather
> than by home rule.  It does allow 12-24 month delays, so the devil very
> much may be in the details.  (And would it trump home rule by-laws?)
>
> 2) Amend MGL4Oc to Introduce a similar standardized Demolition Delay
> process for properties in LHDs — i.e. eliminating the ability to prevent
> demolition in an LHD.
>
> If I read (scan) this correctly, the second section may be a major 40c
> pro-developer loophole for which the first section may be a fig-leaf (he
> said, mixing his metaphors).
>
> It was introduced by Sen. Joanne Comerford (D), representing Hampshire,
> Worcester & Franklin.  I do not see any cosponsors.
>
> Dennis De Witt
>
> _______________________________________________
> MassHistPres mailing list
> MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu
> https://mailman.cs.umb.edu/listinfo/masshistpres
> _______________________________________________
> MassHistPres mailing list
> MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu
> https://mailman.cs.umb.edu/listinfo/masshistpres
> _______________________________________________
> MassHistPres mailing list
> MassHistPres at cs.umb.edu
> https://mailman.cs.umb.edu/listinfo/masshistpres
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.umb.edu/pipermail/masshistpres/attachments/20250612/850bb646/attachment.html>